Disablement - A Social Construction

Many homes, humankind buildings and effortless spaces continue to be contrary and unwelcoming to people with non-normal bodies (Andrews et al. 2012, 1928). With reference to either baulk or automobile trunk size, critically review the various approaches taken by health geographers to the relationship between place, somatic residues and inequalities.\nMichael Oliver suggests that people are non disabled or non-disabled categorically, only if everyone belongs somewhere on a continuum of ability (1990). However he argues the emergence of conventional attitudes towards disability as a sequel of the industrial revolution of the nineteenth century in Britain, as people with hurts were unable to sue their duty to buy the farm in mainstream factories. This led to the marginalisation and segregation of disabled people, to areas away from the economically productive society which had scant(p) public transport, poor instruction systems and few places of both work and leisure (Gleeson, 1999). This essay pass on explore how these attitudes have been well-kept in modern society, specifically through the frameworks of the fond and health check models of disability in regards to public spaces and building design.\nDisability ceases to be something somebody inherently has, and becomes more(prenominal) of something that is done to a individual by somebody else (Oliver, 1998). To be disabled is to encounter experiences of exclusion, and to be faced with social, physical and environmental barriers. This follows the social model of disability which was developed by the Federal of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation, whereby in that location is a distinguishable difference between disablement and impairment (UPIAS, 1976: 14). Disablement is a social construction and is the act of ostracism which perpetuates social oppression and institutional discrimination, such like that of gender, sexuality and race (Barnes, 1991). Disablement represents the absence of choice in the lives of th...